I guess I enjoy the conspiracy theories a bit more than most people because they are almost like reading really good fiction that reads exactly like really good non-fiction (which, technically, it is since the person claiming the theory actually believes it to be true). When Clinton was president it was all about drug running and killing people to get to the top and, always in between, coercing ladies to sit on his jolly roger (and I don't mean his brother). But Bush, well he's got the really juicy conspiracy theories. But my favorite has always been that 9/11 conspiracy. If you haven't heard this one in full detail, it goes something like this:
It begins with the whole Enron scandal which was a company, as you know, that had business ties to both the President and Vice-President because of their large dealings with energy, mainly oil, in Texas. After Enron, the SEC began investigating a multitude of different companies related to Enron and the energy business. These investigative documents were being stored in Building 7 in New York City (whether this is true or not, I haven't the foggiest but I digress).
Next, enter Dick Cheaney and George Bush who, fearing that they will certainly be discovered as crooks greater than even that of Kenneth Lay, orchestrate a plan. They decide to destroy the documents by blowing up the World Trade Center buildings and then, when nobody is really looking, blowing up Building 7 and all of the investigative documents in the process. It was a solid, albeit a bit extreme, plan...sort of like setting off a car bomb so that you could steal a candy bar.
So on September 11th, 2001 the President and Vice President orchestrate their plan by running two planes into the Trade Center buildings and then, later, setting off precise detonations already planted within the building that actually cause the collapse.....oh, and they knock down Building 7 with charges as well but nobody really notices that (which was exactly as planned). They even go so far as to launch a cruise missile into the nearly empty, heavily-fortified side of the Pentagon building. And, sticklers to detail as they are, George and Dick even make up a story about how brave Americans sacrificing themselves in some field in Pennsylvania so that the White House would not be destroyed as well.
But here is the real genius....the amazing brilliance of the plan....they blame the whole thing on terrorists! Brilliant! Now George gets to deccimate an enemy without cause and talk about cherries on the whipped cream on the sundae of this grand theory, guess whose company gets contracted for the multi-million dollar clean up of Afghanistan after we level the place? You got it, Haliburton, the very company once-owned by Vice President Dick Cheaney! This even paves the way to go to war with Iraq, nocking out another vital source of oil energy, and thusly boosting the prices for oil everywhere else. In otherwords, the President's pockets are sure to get well-lined with greenery as well. God, I love the smell of napalm in the morning!
....but there's a problem. Actually, there are a hundred thousand problems but I will address one. It has to do with the Pentagon getting hit by a cruise missile. You see, this is one of the main and most highly touted points in the entire theory. I shall attempt to prove that a plane did, indeed, hit the Pentagon and I shall do it with three counter-points.
Point one, according to the theory, nobody saw a plane anywhere near the Pentagon. Where are the witnesses, they ask? Well, according to
this site there were quite a few witnesses talking about a plane flying dangerously low over I-395. In fact, I found so many witness accounts that I must question by what means these theorists go about looking for witnesses? Do they search Yellowbook under Flight 77 Witnesses and when it comes up with nothing, they figure, "Hell, there must be no witnesses," or, maybe, they just walk the streets asking, "Hey, did you see Flight 77 hit the Pentagon?" After a good ten minutes of searching and finding nobody they must then logically assume that there were not any witnesses.
Point two, where is the wreckage of the actual plane? Well, if you read a few of the on-site witnesses a lot of the plane wreckage got covered up with the roof collapsed. However, when you actually google for pictures of the plane, guess what, all you find are
websites full of pictures of the plane! I guess the conspiracy theorists have realized this as they have updated their argument to: "Where are any big hunks of plane?" which is idiotic since the 757 was going about 500 mph when it hit the building which means it looked something like this: